بررسی رابطه قابلیت پیاده روی در محله و سلامت ذهنی(مطالعه موردی: شهر رشت)

نوع مقاله : علمی - پژوهشی

نویسندگان

• علی اکبر سالاری پور ¹
• زهرا سیف ریحانی ²

¹ عضو هیأت علمی گروه مهندسی شهرسازی دانشکده معماری و هنر، دانشگاه گیلان

² دانشگاه گیلان

https://doi.org/10.22067/jgusd.2022.77401.1216

چکیده

محیط ساخته شده یکی از عوامل مهم تعیین کننده در میزان فعالیت جسمانی و در نتیجه سلامت فردی است. پژوهش حاضر به بررسی تأثیر محیط کالبدی شهر  بر فعالیت جسمانی، انسجام اجتماعی، حس تعلق اجتماعی و سلامت ذهنی می پردازد. به این منظور با استفاده از روش نمونه گیری تصادفی دو مرحله ای، 380 پرسش نامه در محله هایی از شهر رشت تکمیل شد و داده های حاصل با استفاده از مدلسازی معادلات ساختاری در نرم افزار SMART PLS3  مورد تجزیه و تحلیل قرار گرفت. یافته های پژوهش نشان می دهد  که محیط ساخته شده عامل مرتبه دومی از 5 مؤلفه ی نزدیکی به امکانات، کاهش عوامل تنش زای محیطی، کیفیت زیرساخت، دسترسی و اتصال پذیری و خطرات ترافیکی می باشد. محیط ساخته شده به طور مثبت و معناداری بر انسجام اجتماعی، حس تعلق اجتماعی و فعالیت فیزیکی تأثیر می گذارد. حس تعلق اجتماعی و فعالیت فیزیکی نیز به طور مثبت و معناداری بر سلامت ذهنی اثرگذار است. مدیریت شهری می تواند با توجه به ارتقاء مؤلفه های مذکور، قابلیت پیاده روی در محلات شهری را افزایش دهد. بهبود کیفیت محیط ساخته شده منجر به افزایش فعالیت فیزیکی، انسجام اجتماعی و حس تعلق اجتماعی خواهد شد. و در نهایت با افزایش حس تعلق اجتماعی و فعالیت فیزیکی، سلامت ذهنی شهروندان نیز ارتقاء خواهد یافت.

کلیدواژه‌ها

• انسجام اجتماعی
• حس تعلق اجتماعی
• سلامت ذهنی
• فعالیت فیزیکی
• قابلیت پیاده روی

موضوعات

• برنامه ریزی شهری

عنوان مقاله [English]

Exploring the Relationship between Walkability of Neighborhoods and Mental Health (Case Study: Rasht City)

نویسندگان [English]

• Ali akbar Salaripour ¹
• Zahra Seif Reihani ²

¹ Professor Assistant, Dpartment of urban planning, University of Guilan

² University of Guilan

چکیده [English]

Extended Abstract

Introduction

Walking is very good for physical and mental health. Walking reduces obesity, diabetes, and other chronic diseases as well as health care/medical costs. Therefore, a wide range of favorable health outcomes (including reduced cardiovascular risk and death) are the favorable outcomes of walking. Throughout history, walking has been the main mode of transportation in urban areas. However, rapid urbanization and the mass introduction of automobiles in the 1950s, followed by suburban population growth, changed the mode of transportation. These changes created a pattern of urban expansion called sprawl, according to which many people from cities move to the suburbs of their cities. As these areas are hugely dependent on personal cars for transportation due to the mono-functionality and dispersion of daily destinations, they are designed to be low-density housing and special lifestyle. Urban built environments significantly impact on the physical activity of people and consequently their health. Considering the above-mentioned issues, this research investigated the impact of the city's physical environment on residents’ physical activity, social cohesion, sense of social belonging, and mental health.
 

Method

This research is descriptive-analytical. Document, library, and field methods were used for collecting the required data. The data were collected in the early 2022, using a questionnaire. A two-stage random sampling method was applied for selecting the participants. At the first stage, 20 neighborhoods were randomly selected from among the historical neighborhoods of Rasht, Iran. Walkability and density were evident the selected the neighborhoods. Then, 19 residential buildings were selected from among the neighborhood, distributed evenly, and one household in each building was randomly selected for answering the posed questions. From among the questionnaires distributed in 20 neighborhoods of Rasht, 380 questionnaires were completed. The questionnaire entailed two sections. The first section asked some demographic questions, including gender, age, education, monthly income, employment, and marital status. The second section was on the main questions, including items related to nine components. The components were: closeness to facilities, reduction of environmental stressful factors, quality of infrastructure, accessibility and connectivity, traffic hazards, physical activity, social cohesion, sense of social belonging, and mental health. To confirm the validity of the questionnaire enjoying Likert scale, experts commented on the face and content of questionnaire. Its reliability was evaluated using Cronbach's alpha, which was 0.931. Structural equation modeling was applied in SMART PLS3 software for analyzing the collected data.

Results

The results showed that the built environment ranked the second among the components “closeness to facilities”, “reduction of stressful environmental issues”, “quality of infrastructure”, “accessibility and connectivity”, and “traffic hazard”. The built environment positively and significantly influences on the social cohesion, sense of social belonging, and physical activity. Moreover, the sense of social belonging and physical activity positively and significantly impact on mental health. The citizens believed that the more such principles as “closeness to facilities”, “accessibility and connectivity”, “safety”, “quality of urban infrastructure”, “absence of stressful environmental issues” be applied to the neighborhoods, the more the neighbors will deal with physical activities. This issue, in turn, will positively influence on citizens’ mental health. Moreover, the participants believed that if they have a more positive attitude towards their neighborhood, the sense of social belonging and social cohesion will increase. Consequently, people’s mental health will increase. This study revealed that the strategies of urban designing and proper planning policies can directly play a significant role in enhancing social cohesion, sense of social belonging, and walking behaviors and indirectly improve mental health. The way of creating a suitable pedestrian-oriented living environment is so significant not only for the urban designers and planners, but also for managers of cities. Taking the issues into account, we can conclude that the findings of this study can be applied for implementing the related issues.

Discussion and Conclusion

Reviewing previous related studies revealed that this study is among the few ones that explored within a single study the relationships between the components of the built environment, physical activity, social cohesion, sense of social belonging and mental health. Through paying more attention to the dimensions of the built environment, urban managers can enhance social cohesion, physical activity, and the sense of social belonging and, as a result, improve people’s mental and physical health. This study made some suggestions for future research, including doing a similar work in other cities or using other components in the model presented by this study.
 
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

• Keywords: Walkability
• Mental Health
• Rasht
• Accessibility
• Sense of Belonging

مراجع

1. امیرفخریان، م.، رهنما، م. ر.، پوراحمد، ا.، و اجزاء شکوهی، م. (1394). بررسی انسجام درونی محلات شهری در شهرهای اسلامی و تقابل آن با پروژه های نوسازی شهری؛ نمونه محله عامل شهر مشهد. جغرافیا و توسعه فضای شهری، 2(1)، 143-125.
2. حسام، م.، و آقایی زاده، ا. (1395). شناسایی تنگناهای پیاده روی شهروندان در شهر رشت با استفاده از تئوری بنیانی. جغرافیا و توسعه ناحیه ای، 14(2)، 224-201.
3. دماری، ب.، المدنی، س. ح.، حاجبی، ا.، و صالحی شهرابی، ن. (۱۳۹۸). رویکردهای ارتقای سلامت روان در محیط‌های کاری کشور ایران، مروری بر وضعیت موجود و ارائه راهکار‌هایی برای آینده. مجله روانپزشکی و روانشناسی بالینی ایران، ۲۵(۲)، ۱۳۵-۱۲۲.
4. ربانی ابوالفضلی، غ.، رهنما، م. ر.، و خاکپور، ب. (1396). ارزیابی قابلیت پیاده مداری با تاکید بر رویکرد نوشهرگرایی در بلو ار سجاد مشهد. جغرافیا و توسعه فضای شهری، 4(2)، 24-1.
5. طاهری، ش.، قاسمی سیچانی، م.، و شبانی، ا. ح. (1400). تحلیل بعد کالبدی در شفابخشی منظر پارک شهید رجایی اصفهان. جغرافیا و توسعه فضای شهری، 10(1)، 115-89.
6. غلامیان مقدم، ا.، و سعیدی مفرد، س. (1399). تببین شاخص های محیطی مؤثر بر استرس شهروندان در فضای شهری ( مطالعه موردی : محله سیرده سبزوار). جغرافیا و توسعه فضای شهری، 7(1)، 98-79.

 

7. Aletta, F., Lepore, F., Kostara-Konstantinou, E., Kang, J., & Astolfi, A. (2016). An experimental study on the influence of soundscapes on people’s behavior in an open public space. Applied Sciences, 6(10), 276, 1-12.
8. An, R., Shen, J., Yang, Q., & Yang, Y. (2019). Impact of built environment on physical activity and obesity among children and adolescents in China: a narrative systematic review. Journal of Sport and Health Science, 8(2), 153–169.
9. Baobeid, A., Koç, M., & Al-Ghamdi, S. G. (2021). Walkability and its relationships with health, sustainability, and livability: elements of physical environment and evaluation frameworks. Built Environ, 7, 721218.
10. Buck, C., Tkaczick, T., Pitsiladis, Y., De Bourdehaudhuij, I., Reisch, L., Ahrens, W., & Pigeot, I. (2015). Objective measures of the built environment and physical activity in children: from walkability to moveability. Journal of Urban Health, 92(1), 24–38.
11. Cramm, J. M., Van Dijk, H. M., & Nieboer, A. P. (2013). The importance of neighborhood social cohesion and social capital for the well-being of older adults in the community. The Gerontologist, 53(1), 142–152.
12. Dzhambov, A., Tilov, B., Markevych, I., & Dimitrova, D. (2017). Residential road traffic noise and general mental health in youth: The role of noise annoyance, neighborhood restorative quality, physical activity, and social cohesion as potential mediators. Environment International, 109, 1–9.
13. Ebrahim, N. P. (2015). Sense of community in new urbanism neighborhoods: a review. Open House International, 40(4), 25-29.
14. Francis, J., Giles-Corti, B., Wood, L., & Knuiman, M. (2012). Creating sense of community: The role of public space. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 32(4), 401–409.
15. French, S., Wood, L., Foster, S. A., Giles-Corti, B., Frank, L., & Learnihan, V. (2014). Sense of community and its association with the neighborhood built environment. Environment and Behavior, 46(6), 677–697.
16. Georgiou, M., Morison, G., Smith, N., Tieges, Z., & Chastin, S. (2021). Mechanisms of impact of blue spaces on human health: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(5), 2486.
17. Henderson, H., Child, S., Moore, S., Moore, J. B., & Kaczynski, A. T. (2016). The influence of neighborhood aesthetics, safety, and social cohesion on perceived stress in disadvantaged communities. American Journal of Community Psychology, 58(1–2), 80–88.
18. Hua, J., Mendoza-Vasconez, A. S., Chrisinger, B. W., Conway, T. L., Todd, M., Adams, M. A., Sallis, J. F., Cain, K. L., Saelens, B. E., & Frank, L. D. (2022). Associations of social cohesion and quality of life with objective and perceived built environments: a latent profile analysis among seniors. Journal of Public Health, 44(1), 138–147.
19. Huang, N.-C., Kung, S.-F., & Hu, S. C. (2018). The relationship between urbanization, the built environment, and physical activity among older adults in Taiwan. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(5), 836.
20. Lam, T. M., Wang, Z., Vaartjes, I., Karssenberg, D., Ettema, D., Helbich, M., Timmermans, E. J., Frank, L. D., den Braver, N. R., & Wagtendonk, A. J. (2022). Development of an objectively measured walkability index for the Netherlands. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 19(1), 1-16.
21. Li, X., Li, Y., Xia, B., & Han, Y. (2021). Pathways between neighbourhood walkability and mental wellbeing: A case from Hankow, China. Journal of Transport & Health, 20, 101012.
22. Loh, V. H. Y., Veitch, J., Salmon, J., Cerin, E., Thornton, L., Mavoa, S., Villanueva, K., & Timperio, A. (2019). Built environment and physical activity among adolescents: the moderating effects of neighborhood safety and social support. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 16(1), 11-18.
23. Modabernia, M. J., Tehrani, H. S., Fallahi, M., Shirazi, M., & Modabbernia, A. H. (2008). Prevalence of depressive disorders in Rasht, Iran: A community based study. Clinical practice and epidemiology in mental health, 4(1), 1-6.
24. Mouratidis, K., & Poortinga, W. (2020). Built environment, urban vitality and social cohesion: Do vibrant neighborhoods foster strong communities? Landscape and Urban Planning, 204, 103951.
25. Nikooyeh, B., Abdollahi, Z., Salehi, F., Nourisaeidlou, S., Hajifaraji, M., Zahedirad, M., Shariatzadeh, N., Kalayi, A., Entezarmahdi, R., & Ghorbannezhad, Z. (2016). Prevalence of obesity and overweight and its associated factors in urban adults from West Azerbaijan, Iran: the National Food and Nutritional Surveillance Program (NFNSP). Nutrition and Food Sciences Research, 3(2), 21–26.
26. Shin, J., Lee, H., Choi, E. K., Nam, C., Chae, S.-M., & Park, O. (2021). Social determinants of health and well-being of adolescents in multicultural families in South Korea: Social-cultural and community influence. Frontiers in Public Health, 9, 461140.
27. Stewart, K., & Townley, G. (2020). How far have we come? An integrative review of the current literature on sense of community and well‐being. American Journal of Community Psychology, 66(1–2), 166–189.
28. Subiza-Pérez, M., García-Baquero, G., Babarro, I., Anabitarte, A., Delclòs-Alió, X., Vich, G., Roig-Costa, O., Miralles-Guasch, C., Lertxundi, N., & Ibarluzea, J. (2021). Does the perceived neighborhood environment promote mental health during pregnancy? Confirmation of a pathway through social cohesion in two Spanish samples. Environmental Research, 197, 111192.
29. Tang, J. Y. M., Chui, C. H. K., Lou, V. W. Q., Chiu, R. L. H., Kwok, R., Tse, M., Leung, A. Y. M., Chau, P.-H., & Lum, T. Y. S. (2021). The contribution of sense of community to the association between age-friendly built environment and health in a high-density city: a cross-sectional study of middle-aged and older adults in Hong Kong. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 40(12), 1687–1696.
30. Tcymbal, A., Demetriou, Y., Kelso, A., Wolbring, L., Wunsch, K., Wäsche, H., Woll, A., & Reimers, A. K. (2020). Effects of the built environment on physical activity: a systematic review of longitudinal studies taking sex/gender into account. Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine, 25(1), 1-25.
31. Terry, R., Townley, G., Brusilovskiy, E., & Salzer, M. S. (2019). The influence of sense of community on the relationship between community participation and mental health for individuals with serious mental illnesses. Journal of Community Psychology, 47(1), 163–175.
32. Van Cauwenberg, J., Van Holle, V., De Bourdeaudhuij, I., Van Dyck, D., & Deforche, B. (2016). Neighborhood walkability and health outcomes among older adults: The mediating role of physical activity. Health & Place, 37, 16–25.
33. Wang, H., & Yang, Y. (2019). Neighbourhood walkability: A review and bibliometric analysis. Cities, 93, 43–61.
34. Yu, R., Wong, M., & Woo, J. (2019). Perceptions of neighborhood environment, sense of community, and self-rated health: an age-friendly city project in Hong Kong. Journal of Urban Health, 96(2), 276–288.
35. Zhang, J., Zhang, J., Zhou, M., & Yu, N. X. (2018). Neighborhood characteristics and older adults’ well-being: The roles of sense of community and personal resilience. Social Indicators Research, 137(3), 949–963.
36. Zhang, L., Jiang, J., & Wang, P. (2021). Social cohesion associated with health mediated by emotional experience and life satisfaction: Evidence from the internal migrants in China. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 16(3), 1285–1303.
37. Zuniga-Teran, A. A., Orr, B. J., Gimblett, R. H., Chalfoun, N. V, Marsh, S. E., Guertin, D. P., & Going, S. B. (2017). Designing healthy communities: Testing the walkability model. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 6(1), 63–73.
38. Yu, W., Singh, S. S., Calhoun, S., Zhang, H., Zhao, X., & Yang, F. (2018). Generalized anxiety disorder in urban China: prevalence, awareness, and disease burden. Journal of Affective Disorders, 234, 89-96.
39. Wang, R., Xue, D., Liu, Y., Liu, P., & Chen, H. (2018). The relationship between air pollution and depression in China: is neighbourhood social capital protective?. International journal of environmental research and public health, 15(6), 1160.