Political Economic of Tourism and its Policy Implication for Urban Development in Mashhad

Document Type : علمی - پژوهشی

Authors

• arash ghahreman
• ali rahnama
• zahra bostan

Researcher of Department of Sociology of Tourism Institute for Tourism Research, ACECR

https://doi.org/10.22067/jgusd.2021.47610.0

Abstract

Tourism is mainly an urban matter. The main question of this study is about political economy.  How a city that has multiple types of tourism should be developed? We propose the three-level model of tourism-based urban development. The role of government is formulating the function of tourism destinations and making rules and laws for interventions. This is a mixed research. It is based on a systematic review and theories extracted from the field case study.  Optimal urban development of Mashhad regarding tourism from the perspective of political economy requires the identification of the function and political role of the city of Mashhad on a national scale, the identification of formal and informal interest groups, and collective agreement at the level of groups. Accordingly, using the VIKOR technique, the multifaceted tourism development programs in Mashhad were ranked considering the programs and groups involved. The results showed that in both cases, the development of health tourism and the expansion of recreational projects in Mashhad and its surroundings are the highest, so that health tourism is the first one regarding the criterion “groups involved with the program” having zero for VIKOR index, and the development and expansion of recreational projects in Mashhad and its surroundings, ranked the second one, having VIKOR index of 5.

Keywords

• Tourism Policy
• Local Government
• Urban Management
• VIKOR Technique

References

1. ابراهیم آبادی، غ.، چاجی، ل.، و داوود آبادی، م. (1397). ارزیابی عملکرد اقتصادی با رویکرد شیوه خوشه بندی و مدل ویکور (مطالعه موردی، هلدینگ صنعت آب و فاضلاب شهری). نشریه علوم و مهندسی آب و فاضلاب، 47-57.
2. پژوهشکده گردشگری جهاددانشگاهی مشهد. (1396). پیمایش ملی سنجش ارزشها، نگرشها و رفتارشناسی گردشگران ایران. مشهد: جهاددانشگاهی.
3. پیش بهار، ا.، فردوسی، ر.، و حیاتی، ب. (1397). اولویت بندی استراتژی های بازاریابی شرکت صنایع لبنی پگاه آذربایجان شرقی: کاربرد رهیافت های دیماتل و ویکور. نشریه اقتصاد و توسعه کشاورزی، 109-121.
4. سوندرز، پ. (1391). نظریه اجتماعی و مساله شهری. تهران: تیسا.
5. کاپوراسو، ج. ا.، و ولوین، د.پ. (1387). نظریه های اقتصاد سیاسی. (م. عبد الله زاده ، مترجم) تهران: ثالث.
6. محمدی، ج.، و باقری کشکولی، ع. (1393). تحلیل تطبیقی رابطه بین فقر و خشونت شهری با استفاده از مدل ویکور (مطالعه موردی: محله های شهر یزد). نشریه مطالعات نواحی شهری، 125-149.

 

7. Beery, J. (2012). State, capital and spaceships: A terrestrial geography of space tourism. Geoforum, 43, 25-34.
8. Boccella, N., & Salerno, I. (2018). Tourism trends and policies. Alcune riflessioni sul rapport, OECD organization. Rivista di Scienze del Turismo-Ambiente Cultura Diritto Economia, 8(1-2), 19-27.
9. Britton, S.g. (1982). The political economy of tourism in the third world. Annals of Tourism Research, 9, 331-358.
10. Chang, G.C. (2006). Strategic planning in education: some concepts and steps. Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization
11. Cole, s. (2012). A political ecology of water equality and tourism: A case study from Bali. Annals of Tourism Research, 39, 1221–1241.
12. Dwyer, L., Edwards, D., Mistilis, N., Roman, C., & Scott, N. (2009). Destination and enterprise management for a tourism future. Tourism Management, 30(1), 63-74.
13. Dwyer, L., Edwards, D.C., Mistilis, N., Roman, C., Scott, N., & Cooper, C. (2008). Megatrends underpinning tourism to 2020: analysis of key drivers for change. Australia: CRC for Sustainable Tourism.
14. Hung, Y., Gwo-Hshiung, T., & Yi-Hsuan, C. (2009). A fuzzy MCDM approach for evaluating banking performance based on Balanced Scorecard. Expert Systems with Applications, 10135-10147.
15. Mair, h. (2012). Political economy of tourism: a critical perspective. Annals of Tourism Research, 39, 1276-1277.
16. Manzoor, F., Wei, L., & Asif, M. (2019). The contribution of sustainable tourism to economic growth and employment in Pakistan. International journal of environmental research and public health, 16(19), 3785.
17. Nunkoo, r., & smith, s. l. (2013). Political economy of tourism: trust in goverment actors, political support, and their determinants. tourism management, 36, 120-132.
18. Nunkoo, r., ramkissoon, h., & gursoy, d. (2012). public trust in tourism institutions. Annals of Tourism Research, 39, 1538-1566.
19. (2018). Tourism trend and policies. Paris: OECD publishing
20. Opricovic, S. (1998). Multi-criteria Optimization of Civil Engineering Systems. Belgrade: Faculty of Civil Engineering.
21. Opricovic, S., & Tzeng, G. (2004). The compromise solution by MCDM methods: A Comparative Analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. European Journal of Operational Research, 445-455.
22. Pan, X., Rasouli, S., & Timmermans, H. (2021). Investigating tourist destination choice: Effect of destination image from social network members. Tourism Management, 83, 104217.
23. Phelps, C., Heidl, R., & Wadhwa, A. (2012). Knowledge, networks, and knowledge Networks: A Review and Research Agenda. Journal of Management, 38, 1115-1166.
24. Sheng, L. (2011). Foreign investment and urban development: A perspective from tourist cities. Habitat International, 35, 111e117.
25. Wan, Y.P. (2013). A comparison of the governance of tourism planning in the two Special Administrative Regions (SARs) of China - Hong Kong and Macao. Tourism Management, 36, 164-177.
26. Wang, y., & Brannwell, b. (2012). Heritage protection and tourism development priorities in Hangzhou, China: A political economy and governance perspective. Tourism Management, 33, 988-998.
27. Xue, L., Navarrete, D. M., & Buzinde, C. N. (2014). Theorizing the concept of alienation in tourism studies. Annals of Tourism Research, 44, 186-199.