Presenting a Smart City Development Model with an Emphasis on the Characteristics of Education City (Case Study: Qaen City)

Document Type : *

Authors

• Ahmad Asadi ¹
• Mohsen Ahadnejad Roshti ²
• Shahrokh Zadvali khajeh ³

¹ Assistant Professor of Geography & Urban Planning, University of Bozorgmehr Qaenat, Qaen, Iran

² Associate Professor of Geography & Urban Planning, University of Zanjan, Zanjan, Iran

³ PhD of Geography & Urban Planning, Shahid Chamran University, Ahvaz, Iran

https://doi.org/10.22067/jgusd.2022.72739.1109

Abstract

Currently applying new approaches in urban planning in order to achieve sustainable development is an inevitable necessity due to the increasing problems of cities following the increasing expansion of urbanization. In this regard, one of the effective approaches to the sustainable development of cities has been planning to make them smarter. Given the importance of the smart approach in planning cities today, the purpose of this study was to present a smart city development model with emphasis on the characteristics of education city in Qaen. Therefore, the research method is applied in terms of purpose and analytical-exploratory in nature. Structural equation modeling method in AMOS software was used for this study. The statistical population consisted of academic elites and Qaen managers. Due to the uncertainty of the number of statistical populations, through Cohen's formula at the 95% confidence level, 90 people were selected as the sample members. The results showed that the most important variables affecting the feasibility of smart city in Qaen are smart management, smart environment, smart citizen, smart economy, smart mobility and smart life, which have an impact rate of 0.89, 0.81 0, 0.73, 0.65, 0.58 and 0.52, respectively. The results also indicated that the education approach (education city) can play a pivotal role in achieving the indicators of Qaen smart city through planning three dimensions: educational facilities, urban environment, and citizens. In this regard, it can be said that about 64% of the realization of Qaen smart city is explained by the existence and realization of the indicators of education city.

Keywords

• Urban Planning
• Urban Development
• Smart City
• Educator City
• Qaen

References

1. براتی، ن.، و ثامنی، ا. (1390). شهر آموزش‌دهنده؛ ضرورت و راهکارها. تهران: انتشارات مرکز مطالعات و برنامه‌ریزی شهر تهران.
2. پوراحمد، ا.، زیاری، ک.، حاتمی‌نژاد، ح.، و پارسا، ش. (1397). شهر هوشمند: تبیین ضرورت‌ها و الزامات شهر تهران برای هوشمندی. نگرش‌های نو در جغرافیای انسانی، 10(38)، 22-1.
3. رهنما، م.ر.، حسینی، س.م.، و محمدی حمیدی، س. (1399). سنجش و ارزیابی شاخص‌های شهر هوشمند در کلان‌شهر اهواز. پژوهش‌های جغرافیای انسانی، 52(2)، 611-589.
4. سیدجوادین، س.ر. (1394). مبانی و کاربردهای مدیریت منابع انسانی و امور کارکنان. چاپ هشتم. تهران: انتشارات نگاه دانش.
5. مهدوی‌نژاد، م.ج.، بمانیان، م.ر.، و امینی، م. (1392). ارائه‌ی الگوها و روش‌های مطلوب تبدیل شهر تهران به شهر آموزش‌دهنده (با تأکید بر اصول و تجارب جهانی). مدیریت شهری، 11(31)، 106-83.
6. وحدت، س.، و کریمی مشاور، م. (1395). مطالعه‌ی تطبیقی دیدگاه‌های متخصصان و شهروندان در راستای تبدیل محیط‌های شهری به فضاهای یاددهنده‌ِی اجتماعی (مطالعه موردی: همدان). پژوهش‌های جغرافیای برنامه‌ریزی شهری، 4(1)، 116-89.

 

7. Borja, J. (2007). Counterpoint: intelligent cities and innovative cities. Universitat Oberta de Catalunya (UOC) papers: E-Journal on the Knowledge Society, 5. Available from: http://www.uoc.edu/uocpapers/5/dt/eng/mitchell.pdf.
8. Boyld, D., Goldhaber, D., Lankford, H., & Wyck off, J. (2008). The effect of certification and preparation on teacher quality. Journal of Future Child, 17(3), 45-68.
9. Castanho, M., Ferreira, F., Carayannis, E., & Ferreira, J. (2021). SMART-C: developing a “smart city” assessment system using cognitive mapping and the Choquet integral. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 68 (2), 562–573.
10. Chourabi, H., Nam, T., Walker, S., Gil-Garcia, J.R. Mellouli, S., Nahon, K., Pardo, T.A., & Jochen Scholl, H. (2012). Understanding smart cities: an integrative framework. 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
11. Correia, J., Ferreira, F., Meidut˙ e-Kavaliauskien˙ e, I., Pereira, L., Zopounidis, C., & Correia, R. (2020). Factors influencing urban investment attractiveness: an FCM-SD approach. International Journal of Strategic Property, 24(4), 237–250.
12. Faria, P., Ferreira, F., Jalali, M., Bento, P., & Ant´onio, N. (2018). Combining cognitive mapping and MCDA for improving quality of life in urban areas. Cities – The International Journal of Urban Policy and Planning, 78, 116–127.
13. Fernandes, I., Ferreira, F., Bento, P., Jalali, M., & Ant´onio, N. (2018). Assessing sustainable development in urban areas using cognitive mapping and MCDA. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 25 (3), 216–226.
14. Figueras, B. P. (2008). Educating cities: a commitment to the future. In Eulàlia Bosch (Eds). Education and Urban Life: 20 Years of Educating Cities. Barcelona: Arts Gràfiques Bobalà, SL.
15. Hyeok Yang, J. (2012). Smart city strategy smart city consultant KC smart services KT corp. Incheon: U-City Company,.
16. Kogan, N., & Lee, K.J. (2014). Exploratory research on the success factors and challenges of smart city projects. Asia Pacific Journal of Information Systems, 24(2), 141-189.
17. Kumar, T. V., & Dahiya, B. (2017). Smart economy in smart cities. In smart economy in smart cities. Singapore: Springer.
18. Kumar, Y., Patil, B., Khaligh, A., Hadi, S., Uyar, T., & Tuncel, D. (2019). Novel supramolecular photocatalyst based on conjugation of cucurbit [7] uril to non-metallated porphyrin for electrophotocatalytic hydrogen generation from water splitting. The European Society Journal for Catalysis, 11 (13), 2937–3124.
19. Lucio, J. (2010). The educating city: an intercultural approach through social-educational mediation processes. Austria: Center for Systematic Musicology University of Graz.
20. Marceau, J. (2008). Introduction: innovation in the city and innovative cities. Innovation: Management, Policy & Practice, 10(2-3), 136-145.
21. Miguel, B., Ferreira, F., Banaitis, A., Banaitien˙ e, N., Meidut˙ e-Kavaliauskien˙ e, I., & Falc˜ao, P. (2019). An expanded conceptualization of “smart” cities: adding value with fuzzy cognitive maps. E+M Economics and Management, 22 (1), 4–21.
22. Moodley, S. (2020). Exploring the mechanics of city-to-city learning in urban strategic planning: insights from southern Africa. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 2(1), 1-13.
23. Nakano, A., & Washizu, A. (2021). Will smart cities enhance the social capital of residents? The importance of smart neighborhood management. Cities, 115, 1-21.
24. Nunes, S.A.S., Ferreira, F.A.F., Govinden, K., & Pereira, L.F. (2021). “Cities go smart!”: a system dynamics-based approach to smart city conceptualization. Journal of Cleaner Production, 313, 1-15.
25. Ortega-Momtequín, M., Rubiera-Moroll´on, F., & P´erez-Gladish, B. (2021). Ranking residential locations based on neighborhood sustainability and family profile. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 28 (1), 49–63.
26. Radenković, B., Despotović-Zrakić, M., Bogdanović, Z., Barać, D., Labus, A., & Bojović, Ž. (2017). Internet inteligentnih uređaja. Fakultet organizacionih nauka Univerziteta u Beogradu, Belgrade.
27. Rios, P. (2012). Creating “the smart city”. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Detroit Mercy, Detroit, MI, USA.
28. Salvia, G., & Morello, E. (2020). Sharing cities and citizens sharing: Perceptions and practices in Milan. Cities, 98, 1-15.
29. Schaffers, H., Komninos, N., Pallot, M., & Trousse, B. (2011). Smart cities and the future internet: towards cooperation frameworks for open innovation. The Future Internet - Future Internet Assembly 2011: Achievements and Technological Promises Conference. Cham: Springer.
30. Toppeta, D. (2010). The smart city vision: how innovation and ICT can build smart, “livable”, sustainable cities. The Innovation Knowledge Foundation. Available from http://www.thinkinnovation.org/file/research/23/en/Toppeta_Report_005_2010.pdf
31. Vidiasova, L., Tensina, I., & Vidiasov, E. (2019). Adaptation of smart city technologies in Saint Petersburg: a survey. International conference on digital transformation and global society (pp. 199–211). Cham: Springer.
32. Von Schonfeld, K. C., Tan, W., Wiekens, C., & Janssen-Jansen, L. (2019). Unpacking social learning in planning: Who learns what from whom? Urban Research & Practice, 13(4), 1–23.

Washburn, D., Sindhu, U., Balaouras, S., Dines, R. A., Hayes, N. M., & Nelson, L. E. (2010). Helping CIOs understand "smart city" initiatives: defining the smart city, its drivers, and the role of the CIO. Cambridge, MA: Forrester Research, Inc. Available from http://public.dhe.ibm.com/partnerworld/pub/smb/smarterplanet/forr_help_cios_und_smart_city_initiatives.pdf