Environmental Affordances Affecting Self-Awareness in Selected Residential Complexes of Mashhad

Document Type : علمی - پژوهشی

Authors

• Hamed Beyti ¹
• Minoo gharehbaglou ²
• Elmira Karimipour ³

¹ Associate Professor. Faculty of Architecture and Urbanism, Tabriz Islamic Art University (TIAU)

² Faculty member of Architecture and Urban Planning, Tabriz University of Islamic Arts

³ PH.D student of Islamic Architecture Engineering/ Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Tabriz University of Islamic Arts

https://doi.org/10.22067/jgusd.2023.79983.1272

Abstract

Extended Abstract

Introduction

A good life emerges from living and reflecting on one’s own existence. It can therefore be regarded as an educational process aimed at discovering oneself moment by moment, identifying weaknesses, learning from mistakes, and comprehending the quality of experiences in various situations to perform better in the future. If a prescription were to be written for improving the quality of human life, it should be based on self-awareness, which involves familiarity with oneself and one’s surroundings. One of the primary sources of self-awareness is the environment. The living environment possesses the capacity to utilize a set of environmental affordances to meet the criteria for self-awareness. In this respect, housing closely tied to the evolving nature of human life and particularly residential complexes, due to the necessity of understanding the thought processes and perception of an integrated whole, gain significance because of their high socializing potential.
Given that Mashhad, as Iran’s second-largest metropolis, has experienced recent developments that have disrupted the spatial structure of its neighborhoods, ruined the physical identity and continuous social fabric of its residents, and diminished face-to-face interactions, this city has been chosen as the case study. This study aimed to explore the scientific relationship between the residential environment and self-awareness.
The residential complex, as the physical framework of collective life, highlights the social dimension of housing. Understanding the concept of an integrated whole necessitates self-awareness, encompassing self-evaluation, predicting how others perceive an individual, and acting based on shared beliefs and values. This study tried to answer the following questions: What is the relationship between the environment and self-awareness? What environmental affordances of a residential complex can influence self-awareness?
 

Method

This study, as a scientific approach, aimed to explore the relationship between residential complex environments and self-awareness through a combination of fundamental and exploratory research. It employed a mixed-method approach (qualitative and quantitative). The qualitative research included a descriptive-analytical review of the literature, followed by exploratory interviews conducted using snowball sampling among experts (university faculty members and housing specialists) until theoretical saturation was reached with 33 participants.
The content analysis of the interviews was performed in two levels. At the first level, multiple physical, functional, and symbolic affordances were identified. At the second level, which involved abstracting concepts from the first level, shared themes connecting the findings across all interviews were categorized into specific dimensions. Subsequently, the quantitative research was conducted in four stages: 1) Developing and distributing questionnaires, 2) Assessing data reliability, 3) Evaluating the external model, 4) Empirically testing the operational research model. Given its results, implications, and subject matter, this study is applied research.

Results

The results clearly demonstrate that self-awareness originates from three sources: the self, the physical environment, and the social environment. It exists in two types: internal (involving the self and the physical environment) and external (involving the self and the social environment). The integration of the physical and social environments forms five levels of self-awareness. Their significance in residential complexes, in order of importance, includes: 1) Permanence level, 2) Meta level, 3) Differentiation level, 4) Identification level, 5) Situation level. The most influential environmental affordances corresponding to these levels are as follows: Permanence level: Mystical transition; Meta level: Continuity of scenarios; Differentiation level: Functional organization; Identification level: Identity acceptance; and Situation level: Presence of nature. Among these, physical affordances were found to have the greatest influence on achieving levels of self-awareness, while other affordances alone were insufficient to meet the self-awareness levels within residential complexes.

Discussion and Conclusion

What distinguishes this research from previous studies, which considered increased self-awareness as inversely related to environmental engagement, is its focus on the environment’s potential to enhance self-awareness. This study confirms that the sources of self-awareness (self, physical environment, and social environment) are intertwined with the environment, rather than opposing it. Another distinguishing aspect is its deviation from prior research, which emphasized the influence of the environment on beliefs, tendencies, and lifestyle choices. Instead, this study investigates self-awareness in the environment using mirror pattern theory. This theory has been applied in other contexts, such as Keromnes et al. (2019) offering a novel perspective on body perception, and Xiong (2020) using it for poster design to illustrate child development. However, the present study employs this theory to define levels of self-awareness within the environment, aligns them with environmental affordances, and determines their relative importance.
It is noteworthy that this research specifically focuses on residential complexes. Therefore, the importance of self-awareness levels and the corresponding influential environmental affordances might differ in other housing typologies, making them topics for future research. The varying impact of the environmental affordance of “depth of observation” on different self-awareness levels also warrants further study. Additionally, two excluded items, “providing specific functionality in outdoor spaces” at the situation level and “participatory design” at the identification level, due to internal inconsistencies, are potential areas for further exploration in future research.
 
 

Keywords

• Keywords: Quality of Life
• Self-awareness
• Environmental Affordances
• Residential Complex

Main Subjects

• urban planinnin

References

• افشار، ز.، هنرفر، ر.، و قاضی، ر. (1398). ارزیابی شاخصه‌های مسکن در برج‌های مسکونی کلانشهر مشهد (نمونه موردی: مجتمع بلندمرتبه باران۱). کنفرانس بین المللی پیشرفت های اخیر در علوم اطلاعات، مهندسی و فناوری.
• انصاری، م.، و مؤمنی، ک. (۱۳۸۹). بررسی نقش عوامل‌محیطی بر رفتار انسان. گزارش سازمان نظام‌مهندسی ساختمان استان فارس، (19)، ۶۶- ۶۷
• استیس، و. (1371). فلسفه‌هگل. حمید عنایت، مترجم، چاپ پنجم، تهران: سازمان انتشارات و آموزش انقلاب‌اسلامی.
• اسحاقیﻧﺴب، ا.، و زماﻧیها، ح. (۱۳۹۸). نسبت بین خودآگاهی و آگاهی به غیر در فلسفه ارسطو و ابن سینا. ذهن. (82)، 109-134.
• باطنی خسروشاهی، ا.، و بلیلان اصل، ل. (1394). بررسی تأثیر فرآیند ادراک در رابطه انسان محیط و نقش آن در طراحی محیط شهری. کنفرانس بین المللی انسان، معماری، عمران و شهر.
• پاکزاد، ج. (1385). مبانی نظری و فرایند طراحی شهری. تهران: انتشارات شهیدی.
• پالاسما، ی. (1389). هویت حریم خصوصی و مأوا. پدیدارشناسی مفهوم خانه در نقاشی. معماری و سینما، امیر امجد، مترجم، ماهنامه صنعت سینما، (۹۷)، ۱21-۱16.
• ثمین شریفی میاوقی، ا.، یعقوبی سنقرچی، م.، و حق لسان، م. (1398). ارزیابی مؤلفه‌های ارزشی معماری ‌مسکن مطلوب بر اساس نظام معرفتی اسلام (نمونه موردی: خانه‌های معاصر ارومیه). آموزش و ارزشیابی، 12(48)، 62ـ
• چرچلند، پ. (1393). مادی‌انگاری حذفی و گرایش‌های‌گزاره‌ای (نظریه حذف‌گرایی در فلسفه ذهن). یاسر پوراسماعیل، مترجم. قم: پژوهشگاه علوم و فرهنگ اسلامی.
• خاکپور، ب.، مافی،ع.، و باوان پور، ع. (۱۳۸۸). نقش سرمایه اجتماعی در توسعه پایدار محله ای نمونه کوی سجادیه در مشهد. مجله جغرافیا و توسعه ناحیه ای، ۱۲(۲)، ۵۶-۸۱.
• رسولی محلاتی، ه. (1378). شرح غررالحکم و دررالکلم آمدی. تهران: دفتر نشر فرهنگ‌اسلامی.
• سیدمن، ا. (1395). مصاحبه به عنوان یک روش پژوهش کیفی؛ راهنمای پژوهشگران علوم تربیتی، اجتماعی و انسانی. علی کوشا زاده، علیرضا جابری و سارا حسینی ارانی، مترجم، تهران: انتشارات مهکامه.
• ضمیران، م. (1383). مقوله بین الاذهان و دیالوگ. فرهنگ اندیشه، (12)، 126-۱13.
• طاهری، ث.، و طاهری، ج. (1398). ارزیابی عوامل‌محیطی مؤثر بر سلامت روان در مجموعه‌های‌مسکونی (نمونه موردی: مجموعه‌های ۵۱۲ و۶۰۰ دستگاه شهر مشهد). هویت شهر، ۱۳(40)، ۵۷-۷۴.
• عزیزی، م.م.، و معینی، م. (1390). تحلیل رابطه بین کیفیت محیطی و تراکم ساختمانی. هنرهای زیبا، (45)، 16-5.
• لنگ، ج. (1395). آفرینش نظریه معماری: نقش علوم رفتاری در طراحی محیط. تهران: موسسه چاپ و انتشارات دانشگاه تهران
• مارکوس، ک.ک. (1382). خانه: نماد خویشتن. علی علیقیان، مترجم. خیال بهار، 36-119.
• مطلبی، ق. (1380). روانشناسی محیطی: دانشی نو در خدمت معماری و طراحی شهری. هنرهای زیبا، (10)، ۵۲-۶۷.
• مطلبی، ق. (1385). بازشناسی نسبت فرم و عملکرد در معماری. هنرهای زیبا، (25)، ۵۵-۶۴.
• مکاریک، ا. (1390). دانشنامه ی نظریه‌های ادبی معاصر. مهران مهاجر و محمد نبوی، مترجم. تهران: آگه.
• نقی‌زاده، م. (1391). حس حضور، مطلوب‌ترین برآیند ارتباطات انسان با محیط. نشریه مطالعات معماری ایران، ۱(2) ، 46ـ
• نصیرسلامی، م. ر.، و سوهانگیر، س.(1392). راهکارهایی جهت ارتقاء کیفیت اثر متقابل انسان و محیط بر یکدیگر با رویکرد روان شناسی محیطی. تحقیقات روانشناختی، ۵(۱۹)،100-79
• ورنون، م. (1398). زندگی خوب: ۳۰گام فلسفی برای کمال بخشیدن به هنر زیستن. پژمان طهرانیان، مترجم، تهران: نشر نو.

 

• Ackerman, C. (2021). What Is Self-Awareness and Why Is It Important? [+5 Ways to Increase It. https://positivepsychology.com/.
• Baumeister, R. F. (Ed.). (1999). The self in social psychology. Philadelphia: PA: Psychology Press (Taylor & Francis)
• Bermudez, J. L. (1998). The Paradox of self- self-Consciousness. US: MIT Press
• Benjamin, B. (2019). Why most people lack self-awareness and what to do about It. Training Magazine. March 18, https://trainingmag.com/why-most-people-lack-self-awareness-and-what-do-about-it / (accessed 2020)
• Block, N. (1995). On a confusion about a function of Consciousness, pp:208-214, In: Philosophy of Mind: Classical and Contemporary Readings, ed. David J. Chalmers. New York: Oxford University Press, 116–125
• Chalmers, (1995). Facing up to the problem of consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 2(3), 200-219.
• De Dreu, C.K.W., van Knippenberg, D. (2005). The possessive self as a barrier to conflict resolution: Effects of mere ownership, process accountability, and self-concept clarity on competitive cognitions and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(3), 345–357. 
• Duval, S., Wicklund, R. A. (1972). A theory of objective self-awareness. Academic Press.
• Eurich, T. (2018). What self-awareness really is (and how to cultivate it). Harvard Business Review. https:// org/ 2018/ 01/ what- self- awareness-really- is- and- how-to-cultivate-it. (accessed July 4, 2020).
• Farrell, J., & McClelland, T. (2017). Consciousness and inner awareness. Review of Philosophy and Psychology; (8), 1-22
• Gallager, Sh., & Zahavi, D. (2008). Consciousness and self-consciousness. in The Phenomenological Mind. New York: Routledge.
• Giananti, A. (2021). I know how I know: perception, self-awareness. Self-Knowledge, Synthase, (198),10355–10375.
• Gombrich, E. H. (1963). Meditations on a Hobby Horse. London: Phaidon Press.
• James, W. (1890). The principles of New York: Holt.
• Lynch, K. (2005). A theory of city form, (Seyed Hossein Bahrainy:trans).Tehran: University of Tehran
• Lewis, M. (1990). Self-knowledge and social development in early life. In L. A. Pervin (Ed.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research.The Guilford Press, 277–300
• Manson, M. (2018). The Three Levels of Self-Awareness. NET. May 3. https:// markmanson.net/self-awareness (accessed 2020).
• McLeod, S. A. (2008). Self-concept. Simply Psychology. www.simplypsychology.org/self-concept.html.
• Morin, A. (2004), A Neurocognitive and Socioecological Model of Self-Awareness. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 130(3), 197–222.
• Morin, A. (2011). Self-awareness Part 2: Neuroanatomy and importance of inner speech. Social and Personality Psychology Compass,(2), 1004-1017.
• Nida-Rumelin, M. (2017). Self-awareness, Review of Philosophy and Psychology, Springer, (8), 55–82.
• Rennie, L.J., Harris, P.R., & Webb, T.L. (2016). Visualizing actions from a third-person perspective: effects on health behavior and the moderating role of behavior difficulty. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 26, 12410.
• Rochat, P., & Striano, T. (1999). Social cognitive development in the first year. In P. Rochat (Ed.), Early social cognition. Mahaw, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Rochat, Ph. (2003). Five levels of self-awareness as they unfold early in life. Atlanta: Department of Psychology, Emory University.
• Rosenberg, M. (1979), Components of Rosenberg’s self-esteem scale. Conceiving the self. New York: Basic Books.
• Rosenthal, D.M. (1986). Two Concepts of Consciousness. Philosophical Studies, 49(3), 329-359.
• Scheibe, K. E. (1985). Historical perspectives on the presented self. In B. R. Schlenker (Ed.), The self and social life, New York: McGraw-Hill.
• Searle, R. (1997). The Mystery of Consciosness. New York: A New York.
• Short, J.R.(2006). Urban Theory Acritical Assessment. New York: Pal.
• Stepelevich, L. (1993). Selected Essays on G.W.F Hegel. Humanitics press international, Inc.
• Xiong, (2020). Self-awareness: A dynamic poster design about self-awareness child development. NY: Rochester Institute of Technology Rochester.
• Zahedi, M.J, SHirani, M, Alipour, P. (2009). The relationship between social capital and social welfare, Welfare social. Scientific and research journal, 9(32), 1870.