نوع مقاله : پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد مدیریت اجرایی، دانشگاه هرمزگان، بندرعباس، ایران

2 استادیار اقتصاد، دانشگاه هرمزگان، بندرعباس، ایران

3 استادیار مدیریت بازرگانی، دانشگاه هرمزگان، بندرعباس، ایران

چکیده

هدف از انجام پژوهش حاضر بررسی عوامل انگیزشی و بازدارنده‌ی فلش­ پکرها در ایران به عنوان سبکی جدید در حوزه گردشگری می­ باشد. بدین­ منظور، برای گردآوری داده ­ها، از مصاحبه‌ی نیمه ­­ساختاریافته استفاده‌شد. تحلیل محتوای یافته‌ها نشان داد که عوامل مؤثر در انتخاب سفر به سبک فلش ­­پکری در شهرهای ایران در دو مضمون عوامل پیش‌ران و عوامل پیش‌خوان طبقه‌بندی می‌شود. عوامل پیش ­ران، شامل دو مقوله عوامل فردی با چهار مؤلفه تجربه گرایی، خودشکوفایی، فرار از روزمرگی و افزایش اطلاعات عمومی بوده و عوامل اجتماعی، شامل تجربه سه مقوله آزادی، استقلال و آسایش در سفر می­باشد. عوامل پیش­خوان، شامل مقوله عوامل حاضر در مقصد با دو مؤلفه جاذبه­ های گردشگری مقصد و کسب علم یا مهارت ­آموزی می ­باشد. همچنین، بررسی عوامل بازدارنده از سفر به سبک فلش پکری در سه مضمون اصلی زیرساخت ها، عوامل امنیتی و عوامل ارتباطی طبقه­ بندی می­ گردد. زیرساخت­ ها شامل دو مقوله زیرساخت­ های بهداشتی و زیرساخت­ های رفاهی می­ باشد. زیرساخت­ های بهداشتی شامل دو مؤلفه آلودگی محیط­زیست و کمبود خدمات درمانی بوده و زیرساخت­­ های رفاهی شامل کیفیت حمل و نقل و مکان­ های اقامتی می باشد. عوامل امنیتی شامل مقوله امنیت اجتماعی بوده که به دو مؤلفه امنیت فیزیکی و روانی تقسیم می­گردد. عوامل ارتباطی نیز شامل مقوله فناوری و ارتباطات می ­باشد که در دو مؤلفه پوشش شبکه و فیلترینگ طبقه ­بندی می­ گردد. در نتیجه، یکی از عوامل مهم در طبقه ­بندی و شناسایی انواع گردشگران شناخت انگیزشی آن­ها می­ باشد که نقش مهمی در پیش­ بینی رفتار مصرف­ کننده در حوزه بازاریابی و همچنین تنظیم میزان عرضه و تقاضا در حوزه ­ی گردشگری دارد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Facilitative and Inhibitory Factors of Flashpackers’ Motivations(Case Study: Flashpacking in the Cities of Iran)

نویسندگان [English]

  • Seyyed Alireza Hamedi 1
  • Mohammad Mohebi 2
  • Vahid Makizadeh 3

1 MA Student in Executive Management, University of Hormozgan, BandarAbbas, Iran

2 Assistant Professor in Economics, University of Hormozgan, Bandar Abbas, Iran

3 Assistant Professor in Business Management, University of Hormozgan, Bandar Abbas, Iran

چکیده [English]

The study aimed at investigating the motivational and inhibitory factors among flashpackers as the newly emerged travelers in different cities of Iran. To this end, semi-structured interviews were conducted. The findings revealed push and pull factors as the two main contributory motivational factors which can promote the flashpacking style of traveling. Push factors have both the individual and social dimensions. The individual dimension is comprised of four components of empiricism, self-actualization, escape from everyday life, and the promotion of world knowledge, while the social dimension is composed of experiencing the three subthemes of freedom, independence, and comfort. The pull factors are the destination generated forces with two components of tourist attractions and the acquisition of science or skills in a target place. Besides, the findings showed that the inhibitory factors are classified into three main themes of infrastructure along with security and communication factors. Infrastructure includes the two main categories of sanitation and welfare services. Sanitation has the two components of environmental pollution and lack of health services, while welfare includes the quality of transportation and accommodation services. Security factors include social security, which is divided into the two components of physical and mental type. Further, the communication dimension, as the last emerged theme, refers to technology and communication, which is classified into the two components of network coverage and filtering. Identifying motivational factors in tourism can play a significant role in their better classification as a traveler, as well as assisting marketers to predict their consumption approach and regulate the supply and demand in the realm of tourism.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Motivational Factors
  • Consumption Approach
  • Inhibitory Factors
  • Flashpackers
  • Tourism
  • Arentze, T. A., & Timmermans, H. J. (2004). A learning-based transportation oriented simulation system. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological38(7), 613-633.
  • Bernini, C., & Cracolici, M. F. (2015). Demographic change, tourism expenditure and life cycle behaviour. Tourism Management47, 191-205.
  • Cai, W., Cohen, S. A., & Tribe, J. (2019). Harmony rules in Chinese backpacker groups. Annals of Tourism Research75, 120-130.
  • Chung, H. C., Chung, N., & Nam, Y. (2017). A social network analysis of tourist movement patterns in blogs: Korean backpackers in Europe. Sustainability9(12),  1-19.
  • Dayour, F. (2019). Backpackers’ experiences with smartphones usage in Ghana. Anatolia, 30(3), 390-403.
  • Dayour, F., Kimbu, A. N., & Park, S. (2017). Backpackers: The need for reconceptualisation. Annals of Tourism Research66, 191-193.
  • De Focault, B. (1980). Les prairies permanentes du Lieuvin et du Bocage virois. Typologie phytosociologiqye et essai de reconstitution des séries évolutives herbagères. Doc. Phytosoc. ns5, 1-109.
  • Esterberg, K. G. (2002). Qualitative methods in social research. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
  • Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. Handbook of Qualitative Research2, 163-194.
  • Hannam, K., & Diekmann, A. (2010). From backpacking to flashbacking Development in backpacker tourism research. In K. Hannam, & A. Diekmann (Eds.), Beyond backpacker tourism: Mobilities and experiences (pp.1-7). Bristol: Channel View Publications.
  • Hindle, N., Martin, A., & Nash, R. (2015). Tourism development and the backpacker market in Highland Scotland. Tourism and Hospitality Research15(3), 178-192.
  • Hong Kong–motivations, preferences and contribution to sustainable tourism. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing34(8), 1058-1070.
  • Hsu, C. Y., Lee, W. H., & Chen, W. Y. (2017). How to catch their attention? Taiwanese flashpackers inferring their travel motivation from personal development and travel experience. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research22(2), 117-130.
  • Hudman, L. E., & Hawkins, D. E. (1989). Tourism in contemporary society: An
  • introductory text. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
  • Jarvis, J., & Peel, V. (2010). Flashpacking in Fiji: Reframing the ‘global nomad’in a developing destination. In K. Hannam, & A. Diekmann (Eds.), Beyond backpacker tourism: Mobilities and experiences (pp. 21-39). Bristol: Channel View Publications.
  • Maoz, D. (2007). Backpackers’ motivations the role of culture and nationality. Annals of Tourism Research34(1), 122-140.
  • Mascheroni, G. (2007). ‘Global nomads’ network and mobile sociality: Exploring new media uses on the move. Information, Communication, and Society, 10(4), 527-546.
  • Mc Guiggan, R. L. (2000). Which determines our leisure preferences: Demographics or personality? In J. A. Mazanec, G. I. Crouch, J. C. B. Ritchie, & A. G. Woodside (Eds.), Consumer psychology of tourism, hospitality, and leisure (Vol. 2, pp. 195-213). Wallingford, UK: CABI Publishing.
  • Mill, R. C., & Morrison, A. M. (2002). The tourism system. Dubuque, Iowa:
  • Murphy, L. (2001). Exploring social interactions of backpackers. Annals of Tourism Research28(1), 50-67.
  • Muzaini, H. (2006). Backpacking Southeast Asia: Strategies of ‘looking local Annals of Tourism Research, 33(1), 144-161.
  • Myers, L. (2010). Lesbian backpacker travel experiences in New Zealand. In K. Hannam, & A. Diekmann (Eds.), Beyond backpacker tourism: Mobilities and experiences (pp. 126-139). Bristol: Channel View Publications.
  • Nok, L. C., Suntikul, W., Agyeiwaah, E., & Tolkach, D. (2017). Backpackers in
  • Paris, C. M. (2008). The backpacker market: Targeting a mobile population through online communities. VDM Publishing.
  • Paris, C. M. (2010). Backpacker activities and personal values: An SEM approach. Annals of Leisure Research13(1-2), 239-258.
  • Paris, C. M. (2012). Flashpackers: An emerging sub-culture? Annals of Tourism Research, 39(2), 1094-1115.
  • Paris, C. M., & Teye, V. (2010). Backpacker motivations: A travel career approach. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management19(3), 244-259.
  • Paris, C.M. (2014). The virtualization of backpacker culture. Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism, ENTER 2009, Proceedings of the International Conference in Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Richards, G., & Wilson, J. (2004). The global nomad: Backpacker travel in theory and practice. Bristol: Channel View Publications.
  • Rogerson, C. M., & Kiambo, R. (2007). The growth and potential of regional tourism in the developing world: The South African experience. Development Southern Africa, 24, 505-521.
  • Schmoll, G. A. (1977). Tourism promotion: Marketing background, promotion techniques and promotion planning methods. London: Tourism International Press.
  • Swarbrooke, J., & Horner, S. (2007). Consumer behaviour in tourism. New York: Routledge.
  • Uriely, N., Yonay, Y., & Simchai, D. (2002). Backpacking experiences: A type and form analysis. Annals of Tourism Research, 29, 519-537.
  • Westerhausen, K. (2002). Beyond the beach: An ethnography of modern travelers in Asia. Bangkok: White Lotus.
  • Zeng, B., & Gerritsen, R. (2014). What do we know about social media in tourism? A review. Tourism Management Perspectives10, 27-36.
CAPTCHA Image