ارزیابی و تحلیل وضعیت ایمنی و امنیت در حمل و نقل عمومی شهر شیراز با تأکید بر امنیت زنان (مطالعه موردی: کاربران مترو در ایستگاه نمازی شیراز)

نوع مقاله : علمی - پژوهشی

نویسندگان

رضا مرادی رمقانی ¹

محمد حسین سرائی ²

¹ دانشجوی دکتری جغرافیا و برنامه ریزی شهری، دانشگاه یزد، یزد، ایران

² استاد جغرافیا و برنامه ریزی شهری، دانشگاه یزد، یزد، ایران

https://doi.org/10.22067/jgusd.2024.84057.1343

چکیده

مسائل ایمنی و امنیت در حمل و نقل شهری برای چندین دهه مورد توجه برنامه‌ریزان حمل و نقل بوده است. اعتقاد بر این است که ادراکات ایمنی شخصی تأثیر قابل توجهی بر مسافران حمل و نقل عمومی دارد. از این رو هدف اصلی این پژوهش بررسی سطح ایمنی و امنیت ایستگاه متروی نمازی شیراز از دیدگاه کاربران آن است. پژوهش حاضر به لحاظ هدف، کاربردی و بر اساس ماهیت و روش، توصیفی از نوع پیمایشی است. اطلاعات ﻣﻮرد ﻧﻴﺎز ﺑﺮ اﺳﺎس روش‌های اﺳﻨﺎدی و ﻣﻴﺪاﻧﻲ(ﭘﺮﺳﺸﻨﺎﻣﻪ) ﺗﻬﻴﻪ ﺷﺪه است. جامعه آماری تحقیق، کاربران ایستگاه مترو نمازی شهرشیراز در سال 1402 است. محاسبه حجم نمونه طبق فرمول کوکران معادل 384 نفر برآورد گردید و برای توزیع پرسشنامه از شیوه تصادفی ساده استفاده شده است. داده ‌های ﮔﺮدآوری ﺷﺪه با روش‌های آﻣﺎر ﺗﻮﺻﻴﻔﻲ و اﺳﺘﻨﺒﺎﻃﻲ ﻣﻮرد تجزیه و تحلیل ﻗﺮار ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪاﻧﺪ. نتایج نشان داد سطح امنیت در ایستگاه متروی نمازی شیراز از نظر کاربران آن باضریب 68/3 بالاتر از حدمتوسط است. سطح امنیت زنان با ضریب 63/3 بالاتر از حدمتوسط قرار دارد اگرچه نسبت به سطح امنیت مردان با ضریب 73/3 در سطح کم تری قرار دارد، اما این تفاوت از لحاظ آماری معنادار نبود. از بین شاخص‌های امنیت، آزار و اذیت کلامی یا توهین باضریب 36/3 بدترین وضعیت را از نظر کاربران زن در ایستگاه متروی نمازی شهر شیراز دارد. همچنین نتایج دیگر پژوهش نشان داد ویژگی‌های روانشناختی کاربران، ویژگی‌های محیطی ایستگاه و ویژگی‌های فردی کاربران به ترتیب با ضرایب 56/0، 41/0 و 40/0 بیشترین تأثیر را بر ادراک امنیت کاربران از ایستگاه متروی نمازی شیراز داشتند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

امنیت و ایمنی

ایستگاه مترو

حمل و نقل عمومی

زنان

شیراز

---

عنوان مقاله English

Evaluation and Analysis of the Safety and Security Status in Shiraz Public Transportation with an Emphasis on Women's Security (Case Study: Metro Users at Namazi Station in Shiraz)

نویسندگان English

Reza Moradi Romghani ¹

mohammadhossein saraei ²

¹ PhD student of geography and urban planning, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran

² Professor of Geography and Urban Planning, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran

چکیده English

Extended abstract

Introduction

Safety and security issues in urban transportation have been of concern to transportation planners for decades. Since the 1970s, safety and security in public transportation have been analyzed extensively. Most cities in developing countries experience high rates of transport-related injuries, which can be classified into safety issues (accidents) and security issues (criminal behavior). Studies on mobility indicate that certain social groups, particularly women, experience greater concern and anxiety about unpleasant incidents due to inadequate safety or security in transit environments. Women in many developing cities face increasing threats to their safety and security in public transportation. Women are commonly recognized as a group of users of public transport (PT) who encounter more barriers compared to male commuters. Fear of harassment is identified as the primary barrier preventing women from using public transportation. Men also experience similar fears but may under-report them in surveys due to social norms. Therefore, examining gender differences in the perception of safety, rather than women’s absolute perception of safety, is valuable. This study aimed assess the level of safety and security at the Namazi Metro Station in Shiraz from the perspective of its users. It also tried to compare women’s and men’s perceptions of safety and security at the Namazi Metro Station and to investigate the factors influencing the perception of safety and security at the Namazi Metro Station.

Methods

This survey used questionnaire for collecting the required data. The statistical population consisted of users of the Namazi Metro Station in Shiraz in 2023. The sample size, calculated using Cochran’s formula, was estimated to be 384 individuals. Indicators for the studied variables were derived from the theoretical framework and relevant sources, and the questionnaire was designed by the researchers. The reliability of questionnaire was calculated as 0.841 using Cronbach’s alpha. A simple random sampling method was used to distribute and complete the questionnaire. Data were analyzed using SPSS and EQS software, employing descriptive statistics (percentages of users’ individual characteristics) and inferential statistics (one-sample t-test, independent t-test, and structural equation modeling, including confirmatory factor analysis and path analysis).

Results

The results showed that the level of security at the Namazi Metro Station in Shiraz is above average, with a coefficient of 3.68. The security level for women, with a coefficient of 3.63, is also above average but lower than that for men, with a coefficient of 3.73. However, this difference was not statistically significant. Among the security indicators, verbal harassment or insults, with a coefficient of 3.36, were rated as the worst by female users at the Namazi Metro Station in Shiraz. Moreover, the psychological characteristics of users (coefficient: 0.56), environmental characteristics of the station (coefficient: 0.41), and individual characteristics of users (coefficient: 0.40) had the greatest impact on users’ perceptions of security at the Namazi Metro Station.

Discussion and Conclusion

The results indicate that regarding security at the Namazi Metro Station in Shiraz the issue of verbal harassment or insults was rated poorly compared to other indicators. This can be addressed by promoting respect, creating a calming atmosphere, and improving service quality, as most instances of such aggression stem from overcrowding, inadequate facilities, and delays in travel time. Enhancing service delivery and improving environmental characteristics can positively influence users’ psychological characteristics, thereby increasing perceptions of safety and security in public transportation environments. For future research, given the importance of users’ psychological characteristics and the station’s environmental characteristics, qualitative studies through interviews with both officials and users are recommended to explore new dimensions of these factors and contribute to achieving sustainable safety and security in public transportation environments.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Safety and Security

Metro Station

Public Transportation

Women

Shiraz

مراجع

1. زیاری، ک.، و ترکمن نیا، ن. (1392). میزان برخورداری زنان از سیستم حمل و نقل درون شهری مطالعه موردی: منطقۀ 6 تهران. مطالعات و پژوهش های شهری و منطقه ای، 5(19)، 149-168.
2. سازمان حمل و نقل ریلی و قطار شهری شیراز. (1402). اطلاعات خط-1- متروی شیراز. شیراز: سازمان حمل و نقل ریلی و قطار شهری شیراز.
3. سقائی، م.، شهسواری، م .، و خدامی، ه. (1398). بررسی میزان رضایت‌مندی شهروندان شهر اصفهان از شبکه حمل ونقل عمومی و عوامل موثر بر آن (مطالعه موردی: شهروندان مناطق 1 و 3 و 5 و 6 و 8 ). فصلنامه علمی - ترویجی جاده، 27(98)، 145-156.
4. صادقلو، ط.، بازرگان، م.، و بهشتیان مسکران.، ع. (1394). سنجش میزان امنیت فضایی شهروندی با استفاده از مدل های تصمیم گیری چندمعیاره (مطالعۀ موردی: مناطق سیزده گانۀ شهر مشهد). مجلۀ جغرافیا و توسعۀ فضای شهری، 2(2)، 75-90.
5. معاونت برنامه ریزی و توسعه سرمایه انسانی شهرداری شیراز. (1398). سالنامه آماری شهر شیراز، 1398.
6. میرمقتدایی، م.، و عدلی، ف. (1397). توسعۀ شهری مبتنی بر حمل ‌و نقل همگانی و امنیت زنان. نشریۀ هفت شهر، 4(61)، 172-185.
7. نسترن، م.، نوری، م.، و ریخته گران، ف. (1397). تبیین و ارزیابی معیارهای آسایش و آرامش در حمل‌ونقل همگانی درون شهری، مورد مطالعه: خط 28 اتوبوسرانی کلان‌ شهر اصفهان. نشریۀ دانش شهرسازی، 2(1)، 105-121.

 

8. Adebola, O., Samuel, O., Feyisola, A., & Eno, O. (2014). An assessment of public transport security and safety: An examination of Lagos Bus Rapid Transit (BRT), Nigeria. Civil and Environmental Research, 6(4), 105-16.‏
9. Ait Bihi Ouali, L., Graham, D. J., Barron, A., & Trompet, M. (2019). Gender differences in the perception of safety in public transport. Available at SSRN 3486514.
10. ‏ Araya, A. A., Legesse, A. T., & Feleke, G. G. (2022). Women’s safety and security in public transport in Mekelle, Tigray. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 10(4), 2443-2450.
11. Ceccato, V., & Loukaitou-Sideris, A. (2022). Fear of sexual harassment and its impact on safety perceptions in transit environments: a global perspective. Violence against women, 28(1), 26-48.‏
12. Ceccato, V., & Loukaitou-Sideris, A. (2021). Sexual harassment in transit environments among college students in the# MeToo era: Reporting evidence from six continents. American journal of criminal justice, 46(1), 107-129.‏
13. Chowdhury, S., & Van Wee, B. (2020). Examining women's perception of safety during waiting times at public transport terminals. Transport policy, 94, 102-108.‏
14. Currie, G., Delbosc, A., & Mahmoud, S. (2013). Factors Influencing Young Peoples ‘Perceptions of Personal Safety on Public Transport. Journal of public transportation, 16(1), 1-19.‏
15. Delbosc, A., & Currie, G. (2012). Modelling the causes and impacts of personal safety perceptions on public transport ridership. Transport Policy, 24, 302-309.‏
16. Ding, H., Loukaitou-Sideris, A., & Agrawal, A. W. (2020). Sexual harassment and assault in transit environments: A review of the English-language literature. Journal of planning literature, 35(3), 267-280.‏
17. Furstenberg, J. F. F. (1971). Public reaction to crime in the streets. The American Scholar, 40(40), 601–610.
18. ‏Hirtenlehner, H., & Farrall, S. (2014). Is the ‘shadow of sexual assault’responsible for women’s higher fear of burglary?. British Journal of Criminology, 54(6), 1167-1185.
19. ‏Iudici, A., Bertoli, L., & Faccio, E. (2017). The “invisible” needs of women with disabilities in transportation systems. Crime Prevention and Community Safety, 19(3), 264–275.
20. Kacharo, D. K., Teshome, E., & Woltamo, T. (2022). Safety and security of women and girls in public transport. Urban, planning and transport research, 10(1), 1-19.
21. ‏King, J., King, M., Edwards, N., Anam, M., Bull, M., Watling, H., ... & Carroll, J. A. (2021). Exploring women's experiences of gender-based violence and other threats to safety on public transport in Bangladesh. International journal for crime, justice and social democracy, 10(4), 158-173.‏
22. Lagrange, R. L., & Ferraro, K. F. (1989). Assessing age and gender differences in perceived risk and fear of crime. Criminology, 27(4), 697–720.
23. Loukaitou-Sideris, A. (2009). How to ease women’s fear of transportation environments: Case Studies and best practices (Report 08-08). Mineta Transportation Institute.
24. Majd, C. (2013). Next stop, security: Understanding what makes women feel safe in public transportation stations.‏ A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Cornell University, In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science.
25. Olojede, O., Daramola, O., & Olufemi, B. (2017). Metropolitan transport safety and security: An African experience. Journal of Transportation Safety & Security, 9(4), 383-402.‏
26. Romero-Torres, J., & Ceccato, V. (2020). Youth safety in public transportation: the case of eastern Mexico City, Mexico. In Crime and Fear in Public Places(pp. 145-159). Routledge.‏
27. Sam, E. F., & Abane, A. M. (2017). Enhancing passenger safety and security in Ghana: Appraising public transport operators’ recent interventions. Journal of Science and Technology (Ghana), 37(1), 101-112.‏
28. Smith, M., & Cornish, D. B. (2012). Secure and tranquil travel: Preventing crime and disorder on public transport. Taylor & Francis.
29. Tokey, A. I., & Shioma, S. A. (2017). Women safety in public transport.‏ International Conference on Sustainable Development.
30. Uittenbogaard, C. A. (2014). Crime clusters and safety in underground stations (unpublished doctoral dissertation). Stockholm, Sweden: KTH Royal Institute of Technology.
31. Yates, A., & Ceccato, V. (2020). Individual and spatial dimensions of women’s fear of crime: A Scandinavian study case. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 44, 277–292.
32. Yavuz, N., & Welch, E. W. (2010). Addressing fear of crime in public space: Gender differences in reaction to safety measures in train transit. Urban studies, 47(12).