نوع مقاله : علمی - پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری جغرافیا و برنامهریزی شهری، واحد مشهد، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، مشهد، ایران
2 دانشیار گروه جغرافیا، واحد مشهد، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، مشهد، ایران،
3 دانشیار گروه جغرافیا، واحد مشهد، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، مشهد، ایران
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله English
نویسندگان English
Abstract
Today, smart approaches in urban planning have put sustainable and effective solutions in front of policy makers and urban planners to face urban challenges and risks. Meanwhile, smart urban governance is an effective and innovative approach to realize smart and participatory urban management to face urban challenges and make cities resilient and increase social resilience as one of the basic foundations of realizing urban resilience. In this regard, the present research with practical goal setting and "descriptive-analytical" method has tried to study the role of smart governance in the realization of social resilience in urban areas 1, 4 and 10 (as representative of inferior, middle and prosperous areas). Shahri) in the city of Mashhad to be analyzed. In this regard, survey method and questionnaire tool were used to collect data. The sample size is 384 residents of sample areas in Mashhad city, who were selected by stratified sampling method with relative allocation. For data analysis, SPSS software and sample T-Tech test and MEREC multi-criteria decision-making model were used, as well as structural equation modeling in the form of PLS software. The obtained results showed that the role of smart governance in realizing social resilience in areas 1, 4 and 10 of Mashhad shows a positive and meaningful relationship. The results of this research can be useful and effective in informing policymakers and urban planners about the priorities of realizing smart urban governance and urban social resilience and the ways to improve and realize them in the city of Mashhad.
Keywords: Smart governance, social resilience, intelligent participation, social development planning, Mashhad city.
Extended abstract
1.Introduction
Today, cities are rapidly adopting smart innovations to meet their needs and achieve sustainable development goals. Smart urban governance, as one of the fundamental indicators of smart cities, is a process that pursues urban management and planning through smart policymaking, smart planning, and smart services for citizens. Smart governance is not limited to modern technologies; it also includes the participation of social groups, administrative health and transparency, social sustainability, and active citizen participation. On the other hand, cities face numerous natural and man-made hazards, making urban resilience, especially social resilience, a basic priority. Social resilience includes components such as adaptability, trust, social capital, social knowledge, social cohesion, and value-based and planning qualities. The aim of this study is to investigate the role of smart governance in promoting social resilience in Mashhad metropolis. This research emphasizes a comparative study of districts 1 (privileged), 4 (underprivileged), and 10 (middle-class) as representatives of different socio-economic classes. The necessity of this research arises from the fact that no in-depth study has simultaneously examined smart governance and social resilience in Mashhad. Most previous studies have separately addressed good governance or resilience, leaving a research gap regarding the interaction between these two concepts. The significance of this research lies in its ability to help policymakers and urban planners reduce citizen vulnerability, increase public participation, and improve quality of life in Mashhad. Given Mashhad's special position as the second largest metropolis in Iran and the existence of socio-spatial inequalities, this research can guide future planning for smartization and social resilience.
2. Method
This research is applied-developmental in nature and descriptive-analytical in methodology. Data were collected through documentary (library) and survey (questionnaire) methods. The statistical population consisted of citizens aged 18 and over living in districts 1, 4, and 10 of Mashhad. The sample size was determined as 384 participants using Cochran’s formula with 95% confidence level and 5% error margin. The sampling method was stratified sampling with proportional allocation based on the population of each district: district 1 (81 participants), district 4 (140 participants), and district 10 (103 participants). The research instruments were two researcher-made questionnaires developed after studying theoretical foundations and literature. The first questionnaire measured smart governance with 28 indicators across four components (smart policymaking, smart structure, smart services, and smart participation). The second questionnaire measured social resilience with 51 indicators across five domains (knowledge and skills, community facilities, perceivable values and norms, planning processes, and others). To ensure validity, face validity was used. The questionnaires were reviewed by 10 urban management experts (5 university professors and 5 managers from Mashhad Municipality), and necessary corrections were applied. KMO and Bartlett tests indicated sampling adequacy. For reliability, a pilot test was conducted on 50 citizens, yielding Cronbach's alpha coefficients of 0.921 for smart governance and 0.901 for social resilience, indicating good reliability. Data analysis was performed at three levels: first, using SPSS software with one-sample t-test to examine mean scores; second, using PLS software with structural equation modeling to assess the impact of smart governance on social resilience; and finally, using the MEREC model to prioritize indicators for both variables.
3. Results
The one-sample t-test results showed that the mean scores of all smart governance and social resilience indicators in all three districts were significantly lower than the average (3) (p-value < 0.05). Among smart governance components, ‘smart policymaking’ had the highest priority for realization, while in social resilience, ‘planning processes (design and development)’ ranked first. Structural equation modeling results indicated that smart governance has a positive and significant effect on promoting social resilience (R²=0.622, Q²=0.648). Among smart governance components, smart policymaking had the strongest impact (path coefficient = 0.259). Additionally, the MEREC model showed that planning processes (weight 0.328) in social resilience and smart policymaking (weight 0.467) in smart governance are the top priorities for planning.
4. Discussion and Conclusion
The findings confirm that smart governance can act as a positive intervening force to enhance social resilience in Mashhad. This result aligns with studies by Okada (2018) and Lopez & Castro (2020), which emphasize the role of smart technologies and participatory management in increasing community adaptive capacity. The high priority of "smart policymaking" indicates that citizens value transparency, use of modern technologies, and support for elites in decision-making processes. The priority of ‘planning processes’ in social resilience reflects the need for participatory planning, transparent communication channels, and constructive interaction between social groups and responsible institutions. In conclusion, smart governance is not only a modern urban management approach but also an effective tool for reducing vulnerability, increasing public participation, and improving quality of life in Mashhad. Recommendations include strengthening smart participation infrastructure in underprivileged areas (district 4), developing smart urban services in affluent areas (district 1), and expanding smart urban spaces in middle-class areas (district 10).
کلیدواژهها English
